nationalcaseinfo

Time is Limited - Act Now

Time is Limited
Act Now

j3

Sexual Abuse Victims at the Closed Montrose Juvenile Training School for Girls & Boys May Be Eligible to Seek Justice & Compensation for Abuse from Years Past

The turning point in the future of Montrose arrived in the form of tragedies that jolted the public's consciousness.

  • In less than three years, two young individuals committed suicide; 
  • Several other youths made attempts to end their lives;
  • There was also the suicide of a 13-year-old boy in January 1986, who took his life in an isolation room.
  • Following this, public discussions surrounding Montrose's inadequacies peaked, culminating in its eventual closure.

Quick, private case evaluation for condition eligibility and compensation

Recent Changes in Maryland Law Mean Sexual Abuse Victims Can Now Seek Justice And Compensation For Abuse That Occurred Years Ago

Between 1987 and early 1988, Maryland decided to shutter the Montrose Juvenile Training School after serving for almost seven decades.

Montrose, in its physical state, could have been better.

Originally earmarked as a facility capable of hosting 212 individuals, its average population ballooned to around 250 in the later years.

This overcrowding was so severe that, during peak times, makeshift living quarters were set up in hallways or even basements.

Beyond the space issue, Montrose's structures suffered from other drawbacks.

They were aging, had poor ventilation, and lacked sufficient heating.

Other alarming concerns were insect infestations, rodent problems, and potential asbestos threats.

The challenges at Montrose were more comprehensive than its infrastructure—the staff were overwhelmed and needed more training.

This affected the incarcerated youth, some of whom faced neglect and maltreatment. 

Moreover, a significant proportion, almost half of the juveniles, hadn’t experienced out-of-home placements before their time at Montrose.

The facility's isolation unit became notoriously symbolic of its problematic system. 

Here, young individuals were frequently confined for lengthy durations as a method of behavioral control.

iStock-117645642

It's essential to contextualize Montrose within Maryland's larger penitentiary framework.

Maryland had an unsettling distinction at that time—one of the nation's highest incarceration rates, covering juveniles and adults.

Montrose was not an isolated entity; it was one of two prominent training schools in the state.

However, a closer look at the incarcerated youths at Montrose reveals that they weren't particularly menacing or hardened criminals.

A mere 30% had faced charges related to violent acts—instead, the majority comprised of status offenders, misdemeanants, and those who committed property offenses.

An alarming statistic from 1986 found that 44% of the young detainees at Montrose were there due to probation violations, often linked to status offenses like truancy.

Despite its glaring issues, Montrose seemed resistant to criticism and persisted through several reports highlighting its deficiencies.

For many, it remained an overcrowded repository for young offenders.

While the subpar conditions at Montrose were worrying enough, maltreatment allegations brought more scrutiny. Reports of staff mistreating the youths were not uncommon.

But for the longest time, Montrose, deeply rooted in its long history, seemed invincible to reform or closure.

Eligible victims are encouraged to request a free, private case evaluation by our experienced legal staff with the potential for compensation and justice.

Find Out if You Qualify

*Consent: By clicking the "SUBMIT" button, I consent to receive recurring auto dialed and/or text messages from National Case Info, and Tort Intake Professionals LLC or our partners in order to discuss my legal options and at the telephone number I provided. I also consent to the National Case Info Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. I understand that I may receive a call even if my telephone number is listed on a Do Not Call list and that my consent is not a requirement of purchase. I understand that my telephone company may impose charges on me for these contacts and that I can revoke this consent at any time. For SMS campaigns: Text STOP to cancel and HELP for help. Msg & data rates may apply. Recurring msgs up to 27 msgs per month.

Recent Changes in Maryland Law Mean Sexual Abuse Victims Can Now Seek Justice And Compensation For Abuse That Occurred Years Ago

Between 1987 and early 1988, Maryland decided to shutter the Montrose Juvenile Training School after serving for almost seven decades.

Montrose, in its physical state, could have been better.

Originally earmarked as a facility capable of hosting 212 individuals, its average population ballooned to around 250 in the later years.

This overcrowding was so severe that, during peak times, makeshift living quarters were set up in hallways or even basements.

Beyond the space issue, Montrose's structures suffered from other drawbacks.

They were aging, had poor ventilation, and lacked sufficient heating.

Other alarming concerns were insect infestations, rodent problems, and potential asbestos threats.

The challenges at Montrose were more comprehensive than its infrastructure—the staff were overwhelmed and needed more training.

This affected the incarcerated youth, some of whom faced neglect and maltreatment. 

Moreover, a significant proportion, almost half of the juveniles, hadn’t experienced out-of-home placements before their time at Montrose.

The facility's isolation unit became notoriously symbolic of its problematic system. 

Here, young individuals were frequently confined for lengthy durations as a method of behavioral control.

iStock-117645642

It's essential to contextualize Montrose within Maryland's larger penitentiary framework.

Maryland had an unsettling distinction at that time—one of the nation's highest incarceration rates, covering juveniles and adults.

Montrose was not an isolated entity; it was one of two prominent training schools in the state.

However, a closer look at the incarcerated youths at Montrose reveals that they weren't particularly menacing or hardened criminals.

A mere 30% had faced charges related to violent acts—instead, the majority comprised of status offenders, misdemeanants, and those who committed property offenses.

An alarming statistic from 1986 found that 44% of the young detainees at Montrose were there due to probation violations, often linked to status offenses like truancy.

Despite its glaring issues, Montrose seemed resistant to criticism and persisted through several reports highlighting its deficiencies.

For many, it remained an overcrowded repository for young offenders.

While the subpar conditions at Montrose were worrying enough, maltreatment allegations brought more scrutiny. Reports of staff mistreating the youths were not uncommon.

But for the longest time, Montrose, deeply rooted in its long history, seemed invincible to reform or closure.

Eligible victims are encouraged to request a free, private case evaluation by our experienced legal staff with the potential for compensation and justice.

100% Free & Secure Case Evaluations

Answer a few basic questions to get started

We’ll ask specific questions to understand the situation, the injuries, and other vital info to help determine the next steps.

Receive a confidential case evaluation

A qualified legal team led by a personal injury attorney will consider the facts of the case and the potential for compensation.

Have an individual claim filed for compensation

Those that qualify will have an individual claim filed in a court of law for the justice and compensation they deserve.

Don’t suffer the injury of sexual abuse in silence any longer—we fight for justice!

We believe that sexual abuse victims at the closed Montrose Juvenile Training School for girls & boys should be eligible to seek justice and compensation for abuse from years past, starting with a free, private case review.

Please seek the advice of a medical professional before making health care decisions. This advertisement is not associated with any government agency.

www.nationalcaseinfo.com is the property of Shield Legal LP. 7180 Pollock Drive, 2nd Floor, Las Vegas, NV 89119

This website is not part of the Facebook website or Facebook, Inc. Additionally, this site is NOT endorsed by Facebook in any way. FACEBOOK is a trademark of FACEBOOK, INC.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. This Website is not intended to provide medical advice. Consult your doctor or physician before starting or stopping any medication.
Discontinuing a prescribed medication without your doctor’s advice can result in injury or death. are not an indication of future results. Every case is evaluated on its own facts and circumstances. Valuation depends on facts, injuries, jurisdiction, venue, witnesses, parties, and testimony, among other factors. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. National Case Info does not itself provide legal services. Cases will be referred to third party attorneys and law firms. Do not rely on this advertisement in making any medical decision. Please call your physician before making any medical decision, including altering your use of any drug. Court costs and case expenses may be the responsibility of the client. Not available in all states. This advertisement is not intended as a testimonial, endorsement or dramatization, and does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter, either expressed or implied. Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the lawyers' credentials and ability, and not rely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. Only persons age 18 or older have permission to access our Service. Our Service does not address anyone under the age of 13("Children").

Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | CCPA Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell My Info

© 2024 National Case Info. All Rights Reserved